
This would be a good time to talk about criticism. After years of giving and getting, I've come to the conclusion that The Bible was right. We must not judge not lest we be judged.
For instance, last night I did something I have not done in quite some time - I sat down and read a literary journal, The Paris Review, to be exact. I tend to avoid these types of publications because of a weakness over which I have shown little if no control over the years, the second most deadly of sins, Envy. I don't like feeling envious of anything, because until such time as I can admit what I'm feeling is envy and let it go, I'm forced to defend something indefensible, and so I spend days twisting myself into aesthetic contortions to justify my position.
So I did the somewhat less cowardly thing than getting over it, I surrendered, and I stopped reading them altogether. If I couldn't stop drinking I'd stay away from the bars. But yesterday I picked up the Paris Review because I thought perhaps I was over that now. I certainly wanted to be over that, and what's more, I was going to give short stories another try and so I wanted to just hold a journal in my hands again. Not to compare - NO - but just to hold one and see. At least that was the plan.
I did fine with the memoir. I did fine with the poems. But then I came to the short story, and here, sadly, I began to run afoul. It would have been easier, I think, if I had really liked it. But I didn't. It was perfectly well written, of course, only not to my taste. The characters were well drawn, but I didn't really like them. And the ending made fine sense, but it didn't satisfy me.
If I could have left it at that, I would, I guess you could say, have passed the test. But then something else began creeping in. Perhaps there was something "wrong" with the story. I began making a mental list of grievances against it. As the list grew, I was becoming increasingly unsettled. Perhaps it wasn't long enough. Perhaps I should talk to my wife about it. Perhaps I could show exactly why I was right not to enjoy this story and the writer and the editors and anyone else in the world that agreed with them was wrong.
It was then, thankfully, I had an epiphany. I saw myself sitting down to work the next day, and I saw myself, as I do at the start of every work session, rereading my previous day's effort, and that is when it hit me. If I continued to judge this fellow's short story in this way, then tomorrow I would do the same to mine. Instead of reading my work from the inside out - that is, asking only "Is that what I meant to say?" - I would judge it from the outside in, seeing it through the harsh and critical eyes of some unnamed jurist. And I would fail. Because no work can be everything. Nothing can please everyone. Nothing at all. And so I would waste the day's work feeling that what I was doing was deeply and irrevocably flawed, until I'd purged this cruel judge from my psyche and could see my work anew as it was meant to be seen - through my eyes only.
So I stopped. Enough, I said. You must let work you do not care for exist. It must have the right to exist. For if YOU can be such a final judge of other people's work, why then cannot someone else be the final judge of yours?
Perhaps you do not have this same problem. You are lucky. I'd say I envy you but, well, we've been down that road already.